<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Ivan's weblog</title>
	<link>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog</link>
	<description>The life of a Mexican yalie computational chemistry perl hacker</description>
	<copyright>Copyright 2006</copyright>
	<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.2.1</generator>

		<item>
		<title>More chemistry scandals</title>
		<link>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/03/11/more-chemistry-scandals</link>
		<comments>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/03/11/more-chemistry-scandals#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 15:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>Chemistry</category>		<guid>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/03/11/more-chemistry-scandals</guid>
		<description>As pointed out by an anonymous reader, more retractions are shaking the chemistry world. These are for papers by Prof. Sames at Columbia about Ru-catalyzed C-H activation. Check out these blogs for more details:

blog.tenderbutton.com
paulbracher.com

Note added on March 16: Now it's also in the New York Times  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As pointed out by an anonymous reader, more retractions are shaking the chemistry world. These are for papers by Prof. Sames at Columbia about Ru-catalyzed C-H activation. Check out these blogs for more details:</p>
	<p><a href="http://blog.tenderbutton.com/?p=59">blog.tenderbutton.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.paulbracher.com/blog/?p=58">paulbracher.com</a></p>
	<p><strong>Note added on March 16:</strong> Now it&#8217;s also in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/16/science/16chemistry.html">New York Times</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/03/11/more-chemistry-scandals/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chili&#8217;s World</title>
		<link>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/24/chilis-world</link>
		<comments>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/24/chilis-world#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>General</category>		<guid>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/24/chilis-world</guid>
		<description>Chili's World, by my friend Santiago Casares, is now in its fourth season! Don't miss the adventures of Chili, the shy penguin looking for love, Lenny, the lemming with philosophical issues, Mac the cat, and Alice! Here's one of my favorites so far:

  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://www.chilisworld.com">Chili&#8217;s World</a>, by my friend <a href="http://santiagocasares.blogspot.com/">Santiago Casares</a>, is now in its fourth season! Don&#8217;t miss the adventures of Chili, the shy penguin looking for love, Lenny, the lemming with philosophical issues, Mac the cat, and Alice! Here&#8217;s one of my favorites so far:</p>
	<p><a alt="Chili's World" href="http://www.webcomicsnation.com/santiagocasares/chili/series.php?view=archive&#038;chapter=5301#strip6"><img src="http://www.webcomicsnation.com/memberimages/chili016_copy1.jpg"></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/24/chilis-world/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexican Chemistry Scandal!</title>
		<link>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/13/mexican-chemistry-scandal</link>
		<comments>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/13/mexican-chemistry-scandal#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>Chemistry</category>		<guid>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/13/mexican-chemistry-scandal</guid>
		<description>As reported in La Jornada, two Mexican scientists retracted three articles published in Journal of Organic Chemistry, Tetrahedron, and Tetrahedron Letters after finding that the results were irreproducible. The principal investigator is Prof. Eusebio Juaristi, a very well-respected chemist. It should be pointed out that this is being reported over ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As reported in <a href="http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2006/02/13/044n1soc.php">La Jornada</a>, two Mexican scientists retracted three articles published in <i>Journal of Organic Chemistry</i>, <i>Tetrahedron</i>, and <i>Tetrahedron Letters</i> after finding that the results were irreproducible. The principal investigator is Prof. Eusebio Juaristi, a very well-respected chemist. It should be pointed out that this is being reported over a year after the initial retraction, so one can&#8217;t say that the scientists didn&#8217;t admit that there was something wrong with the results in a timely fashion. Making this the main front-page story in a national newspaper is an exaggeration in my opinion, especially giving it a conspiracy-theory title, but we all know that some newspapers like to dramatize things a bit&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/13/mexican-chemistry-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Onion predicted the future!</title>
		<link>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/08/the-onion-predicted-the-future</link>
		<comments>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/08/the-onion-predicted-the-future#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>Silly news</category>		<guid>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/08/the-onion-predicted-the-future</guid>
		<description>My brother sent me these links:
Fuck Everything, We're Doing Five Blades. The Onion, 2004-02-18.
Gillette ups the ante, unveils 5-blade razor. Reuters, 2005-09-14.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My brother sent me these links:<br />
<a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/33930">Fuck Everything, We&#8217;re Doing Five Blades</a>. <em>The Onion</em>, <strong>2004-02-18</strong>.<br />
<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9340767/">Gillette ups the ante, unveils 5-blade razor</a>. <em>Reuters</em>, <strong>2005-09-14</strong>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/08/the-onion-predicted-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Books &#8220;for dummies&#8221; in the 17th century</title>
		<link>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/06/books-for-dummies-in-the-17th-century</link>
		<comments>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/06/books-for-dummies-in-the-17th-century#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 01:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>Books</category>		<guid>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/06/books-for-dummies-in-the-17th-century</guid>
		<description>

A couple of weeks ago I saw this book from 1687 in Beinecke library (sorry for the blurry picture). The text in the title page reminds me of the "for dummies" books, except that it is more verbose and polite:

HODDER's ARITHMETICK:
Or, that Necessary Art 
Made most eaſie
Being explained in a ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><img src="http://ivan.tubert.org/gallery/albums/otono2005/IMG_4110.sized.jpg" alt="Arithmetick book cover page"></p>
	<p>A couple of weeks ago I saw this book from 1687 in Beinecke library (sorry for the blurry picture). The text in the title page reminds me of the &#8220;for dummies&#8221; books, except that it is more verbose and polite:</p>
	<blockquote><p>
HODDER&#8217;s ARITHMETICK:<br />
Or, that Necessary Art<br />
Made most eaſie<br />
Being explained in a way familiar to the Capacity of any that deſire to learn in a little time.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/06/books-for-dummies-in-the-17th-century/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support Denmark</title>
		<link>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/06/support-denmark</link>
		<comments>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/06/support-denmark#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>General</category>		<guid>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/06/support-denmark</guid>
		<description>  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://supportdenmark.com"><img src="/img/SupportDenmarkSmall2EN.png"></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2006/02/06/support-denmark/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligent Falling</title>
		<link>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/11/29/intelligent-falling</link>
		<comments>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/11/29/intelligent-falling#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>Silly news</category>		<guid>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/11/29/intelligent-falling</guid>
		<description>I haven't posted in a while...

This is the most remarkable criticism I've seen for the latest Kansas board of education decision regarding "intelligent design": Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I haven&#8217;t posted in a while&#8230;</p>
	<p>This is the most remarkable criticism I&#8217;ve seen for the latest Kansas board of education decision regarding &#8220;intelligent design": <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/39512">Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New &#8216;Intelligent Falling&#8217; Theory</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/11/29/intelligent-falling/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikis, blogs, and the CIA</title>
		<link>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/10/13/wikis-blogs-and-the-cia</link>
		<comments>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/10/13/wikis-blogs-and-the-cia#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>Geeky stuff</category>		<guid>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/10/13/wikis-blogs-and-the-cia</guid>
		<description>Who would have imagined it? The Wiki and the Blog: Toward a Complex Adaptive Intelligence Community.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Who would have imagined it? <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=755904">The Wiki and the Blog: Toward a Complex Adaptive Intelligence Community</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/10/13/wikis-blogs-and-the-cia/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFPA irony</title>
		<link>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/10/12/nfpa-irony</link>
		<comments>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/10/12/nfpa-irony#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 04:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>Chemistry</category>
	<category>Geeky stuff</category>
	<category>Ramblings</category>		<guid>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/10/12/nfpa-irony</guid>
		<description>Today I saw a fire extinguisher that had the equivalent of this NFPA diamond:



This is a standard code to tell firefighters about the risks of specific substances. The areas covered are health hazards, flammability, and reactivity.

Now, what is ironic is that, when fighting a fire, the last thing I would ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Today I saw a fire extinguisher that had the equivalent of this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFPA_704">NFPA diamond</a>:</p>
	<p><img src="/img/Nfpa_h1.png" alt=""><img src="/img/Nfpa_f0.png" alt=""><img src="/img/Nfpa_r0.png" alt=""></p>
	<p>This is a standard code to tell firefighters about the risks of specific substances. The areas covered are health hazards, flammability, and reactivity.</p>
	<p>Now, what is ironic is that, when fighting a fire, the last thing I would worry about is the hazardous (?) substances contained in the fire extinguiser itself (and I would certainly not expect them to be flammable!). But don&#8217;t worry, the 1/0/0 diamond above means &#8220;may cause irritation", and is the same as the one assigned to substances such as sodium chloride. So, in the end, this is almost like looking at the nutritional information label on a water bottle&#8230;</p>
	<p>Disclaimer: fire extinguishers can be hardazous if misused&#8211;always use the appropriate fire extinguiser according to the fire source and conditions! (And while we are at it, don&#8217;t try this at home, eat fruits and vegetables, and talk to your doctor.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/10/12/nfpa-irony/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man gets convicted for typing &#8220;..&#8221; in browser&#8217;s URL bar</title>
		<link>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/10/12/man-gets-convicted-for-typing-in-browsers-url-bar</link>
		<comments>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/10/12/man-gets-convicted-for-typing-in-browsers-url-bar#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>Silly news</category>
	<category>Geeky stuff</category>		<guid>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/10/12/man-gets-convicted-for-typing-in-browsers-url-bar</guid>
		<description>Yes, that's right, thanks to the Moronic UK Justice System when it comes to Computer Security.

Coming up next: man gets convicted of trying to rotate the knob of a locked door by using his hand...  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yes, that&#8217;s right, thanks to the <a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/news/11341">Moronic UK Justice System</a> when it comes to Computer Security.</p>
	<p>Coming up next: man gets convicted of trying to rotate the knob of a locked door by using his hand&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2005/10/12/man-gets-convicted-for-typing-in-browsers-url-bar/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

