<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spam already?</title>
	<link>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2004/11/24/spam-already</link>
	<description>The life of a Mexican yalie computational chemistry perl hacker</description>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Aspuru-Guzik</title>
		<link>http://ivan.tubert.org/blog/archives/2004/11/24/spam-already#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:14:05 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">38:6@http://ivan.tubert.org/blog</guid>
					<description>	Ivão! It is nice to see your blog! I just came back from an email-less trip, and got around to see it! Good that you joined Rome and me in this Wordpress craze!
	I use the following Spam correction measures:
http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/09/24/three-strikes-and-out-damned-spam-out-i-say/
http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2004/05/24/comment-approval/
	But as you see from http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/09/15/wordpress-comment-spam-stoppage-techniques/
	There might be different alternatives.
	What happens with the three strikes law pugin is that if you add the words of the first spam you get to the database, it will reject the guy the next time. 
	The Central SPAM strategy seems the way to go.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ivão! It is nice to see your blog! I just came back from an email-less trip, and got around to see it! Good that you joined Rome and me in this Wordpress craze!</p>
	<p>I use the following Spam correction measures:<br />
<a href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/09/24/three-strikes-and-out-damned-spam-out-i-say/">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/09/24/three-strikes-and-out-damned-spam-out-i-say/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2004/05/24/comment-approval/">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2004/05/24/comment-approval/</a></p>
	<p>But as you see from <a href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/09/15/wordpress-comment-spam-stoppage-techniques/">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/09/15/wordpress-comment-spam-stoppage-techniques/</a></p>
	<p>There might be different alternatives.</p>
	<p>What happens with the three strikes law pugin is that if you add the words of the first spam you get to the database, it will reject the guy the next time. </p>
	<p>The Central SPAM strategy seems the way to go.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
